Bernie Sanders Eyes ‘Bigger’ 2020 Presidential Run Despite Some Warning Signs

The Vermont senator has indicated he would step aside if another candidate with a better shot at beating Donald Trump should emerge

…His loyalists are sizing up a prospective 2020 Democratic field likely to feature a collection of ambitious liberal leaders — and not the establishment-minded Hillary Clinton.

…Weaver, like Sanders himself in a recent interview, suggested that the senator would step aside if he believes another candidate has a better shot at denying Trump a second term. There are no clear indications from Sanders or those closest to him, however, that he currently has that belief.

Bernie Sanders Eyes ‘Bigger’ 2020 Presidential Run Despite Some Warning Signs | HuffPost

1.) Bernie’s ego and love of the spotlight is too big for him to step aside, even if there was a much better candidate. The idea that he would strikes me as just as big a delusional, ignorant fairy tales as the idea that he would been able to beat Trump the first time.

2.) He didn’t step aside when someone else had a better chance of beating Team in 2016, why would anyone beliwve he’d do it in 2020?

Michelle Obama drops expletive in explaining why women need to do more than ‘lean in’

Former first lady Michelle Obama reportedly offered a pointed opinion of work-life balance and marriage equality for women, saying that the idea that women can have it all is untrue because “that s— doesn’t work all the time.”

“Marriage still ain’t equal, y’all,” Obama said to a crowd gathered in Brooklyn on Saturday for a leg of her international book tour,  several news outlets reported. “It ain’t equal. I tell women that whole ‘you can have it all’ — mmm, nope, not at the same time, that’s a lie. It’s not always enough to lean in because that s— doesn’t work all the time.”

Michelle Obama drops expletive in explaining why women need to do more than ‘lean in’ – CNNPolitics

hmmm

The Patrician President and the Reporterette: A Screwball Story

Poppy wasn’t perfect. I recoiled when he beat Michael Dukakis with the race-baiting Willie Horton campaign designed by Lee Atwater and Roger Ailes. And again when he sent his national security adviser, Brent Scowcroft, to Beijing for a secret midnight champagne toast with the leaders who perpetrated the Tiananmen Square massacre. And again when he didn’t do nearly enough to combat the AIDS epidemic. And again when his White House directed the defense of his Supreme Court nominee, Clarence Thomas, that tried to discredit Anita Hill. Unlike President Trump, who does his own wet work, the Bushes took the more refined route of outsourcing their ends-justify-the-means moves.

But, as politicians go, 41 had many good qualities. Most of the time, he tried to do the right and decent thing, as he saw it, to act for the good of the country and the world.

Opinion | The Patrician President and the Reporterette: A Screwball Story – The New York Times

The most interesting thing about the #41 memorial essays in how they refer to a time when we viewed our politicians through a more nuanced lens.

How DNA Tests Make Native Americans Strangers In Their Own Land | HuffPost

In reality, such testing does not tell us much about our ancestors. That’s partly because of the way DNA is passed down through the generations and partly because there exists no database of ancestral DNA. Instead, the companies compare your DNA to that of other contemporary humans who have paid them to take the test. Then they compare your particular variations to patterns of geographical and ethnic distribution of such variations in today’s world ― and use secret algorithms to assign purportedly precise ancestral percentages to them.

…These three political developments downplay Native American identity, sovereignty, and rights, while denying, implicitly or explicitly, that history created today’s realities of racial inequality. The use of DNA tests to claim “Native American” genes or blood trivializes this same history.

How DNA Tests Make Native Americans Strangers In Their Own Land | HuffPost

hmmm

Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy, sources say

Manafort’s first visit to the embassy took place a year after Assange sought asylum inside, two sources said.

…Visitors normally register with embassy security guards and show their passports. Sources in Ecuador, however, say Manafort was not logged.

…According to sources, Manafort’s acquaintance with Assange goes back at least five years, to late 2012 or 2013, when the American was working in Ukraine and advising its Moscow-friendly president, Viktor Yanukovych.

Why Manafort might have sought out Assange in 2013 is unclear. During this period the veteran consultant was involved in black operations against Yanukovych’s chief political rival, Yulia Tymoshenko, whom Yanukovych had jailed. Manafort ran an extensive lobbying operation featuring European former politicians.

…One person familiar with WikiLeaks said Assange was motivated to damage the Democrats campaign because he believed a future Trump administration would be less likely to seek his extradition on possible charges of espionage. This fate had hung over Assange since 2010, when he released confidential US state department cables. It contributed to his decision to take refuge in the embassy.

…Last week a court filing released in error suggested that the US justice department had secretly charged Assange with a criminal offence. Written by the assistant US attorney, Kellen Dwyer, the document did not say what Assange had been charged with or when the alleged offence took place.

Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy, sources say | US news | The Guardian

hmmmm

Democrats overwhelmingly nominate Pelosi as Speaker amid rebellion

The tally in the secret-ballot vote was 203-32, with three lawmakers leaving the ballot blank. One Pelosi supporter, Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.), was absent as he seeks treatment for an illness in New York.

…[Pelosi] could only afford to lose 17 Democratic votes and reach the magic 218 number.

…It was notable that the votes cast against her were well below the 63 votes won by Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) in his 2016 challenge to the longtime Democratic leader.

…What’s less clear is whether lawmakers who voted against Pelosi in Wednesday’s secret ballot — in many cases with a green light from Pelosi herself — will be willing to do so with the cameras rolling on the House floor and plenty of pressure to back the California lawmaker.

…“I guarantee you, Nancy Pelosi will have the votes,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.). “I don’t have any doubt about that.”

…Sixteen Democrats signed an anti-Pelosi letter last week calling for new leadership.

…A number of other elected Democrats who have not committed to Pelosi did not sign the letter, raising questions of how far they will be willing to take their opposition.

…The Wednesday vote mostly pointed to Pelosi’s muscle and vote-counting skills and leaves her with weeks to pick off opponents or to convince them to vote present on Jan. 3, which would lower the number of total votes needed to win the Speakership.

Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), …[began to do something that resembled a scorched-earth style sort of  backtracking on Monday and said] that the debate had become too focused on Pelosi and suggested negotiations that could lead to changes to the rest of the Democratic leadership team.

Moulton’s comments were directed at Reps. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and James Clyburn (D-S.C.), who along with Pelosi have been in power since before Democrats last won the House.

Democrats overwhelmingly nominate Pelosi as Speaker amid rebellion | TheHill

Jeezus, Seth… Jame Clyburn is a freaking civil rights hero. Apparently, an amount deference to one’s superiors in the military as a component and prerequisite  for moving up doesn’t translate into civilian life for you?  Change can actually be achieved without scorching the earth on your own side, you know…

Mueller and Michael Cohen Bring Trump-Russia Link Into the Open

The details that emerge in the document are fascinating and rich.

But the main takeaway is that Cohen and others in the Trump organization were actively doing a Russia deal that linked Trump’s emerging presidential candidacy with his business interest in a Moscow Trump Tower. And Trump knew about it, to a degree yet to be revealed.

Until now, many have speculated that there must be some link between Trump’s business interests in Russia and his campaign conduct. The Cohen plea provides more concrete evidence of such a link.

…Cohen’s latest revelations on their own don’t constitute evidence of a crime or impeachable offense by Trump. However, they do show that Trump was part of a negotiation that linked his status as a candidate to his business interests in Russia. They bring Mueller’s team an important step closer to explaining Trump’s Russia ties during the campaign.

Mueller and Michael Cohen Bring Trump-Russia Link Into the Open – Bloomberg

hmmm

Income Inequality Explains the Decline of Youth Sports

Going back to 2008, participation is lower across categories, including baseball, basketball, flag football, and soccer, in some cases by a lot: Baseball is down about 20 percent.

…Among richer families, youth sports participation is actually rising. Among the poorest households, it’s trending down. Just 34 percent of children from families earning less than $25,000 played a team sport at least one day in 2017, versus 69 percent from homes earning more than $100,000. In 2011, those numbers were roughly 42 percent and 66 percent, respectively.

…Well-off parents dedicate so much time and money to kids’ sports partly because of the college system, which dangles tantalizing rewards for the most gifted teenage athletes. In the 1990s, Division 1 and Division 2 colleges distributed about $250 million a year in full and partial scholarships to student athletes. Today that figure has grown to more than $3 billion. This scholarship jackpot gives some children from lower-income families a chance to attend schools they might not otherwise afford. But it also sends a clear message to richer parents looking to enhance their kids’ eventual application: Sports matter. As soon as some children enter second or third grade, their parents scramble to place them on youth travel teams, which will set them up for middle-school travel teams, which will set them up for high-school athletic excellence, which will make them more competitive for admissions and scholarships at select colleges.

…In short, the American system of youth sports—serving the talented, and often rich, individual at the expense of the collective—has taken a metal bat to the values of participation and universal development. Youth sports has become a pay-to-play machine.

Income Inequality Explains the Decline of Youth Sports – The Atlantic

hmmmm

Separated by travel ban, Iranian families reunite at border …

Estahbanati, like many Iranian students in the United States, has a single-entry visa and can’t leave the country without risking that she won’t be allowed back in. And her parents, as Iranian citizens, are blocked by U.S. President Donald Trump’s travel ban from visiting her in the United States.

She didn’t want to miss her destination: the Haskell Free Library and Opera House.

Estahbanati and her family had agreed to meet around 9 a.m. at the library, which through a historic anomaly straddles the U.S.-Canada border – and today has been thrust into an unlikely role as the site of emotional reunions between people separated by the administration’s immigration policies.

…”This is a neutral area, but the U.S. government doesn’t accept this situation, and they put a lot of pressure on us,” said Sina Dadsetan, an Iranian living in Canada who traveled to the library to see his sister the same day Estahbanati saw her family.

…As they approached each other at the border, demarcated outside the library by a line of flower pots, a U.S. Border Patrol agent quickly got out of a car parked close by.

“He said, ‘It’s been about a month that we’ve closed this; we don’t allow anyone to meet here,'” Izadmehr said. “I asked him, ‘Can you at least give me permission to hug my sister?'”

The agent allowed them to embrace but barred them from exchanging the gifts they had brought – dresses, Swiss chocolates and a watch – and kept a close eye on them as they talked from opposite sides of the flower pots.

The sisters finally entered the library when a staff member offered them a tour, but Border Patrol agents later chastised the staff member, said Izadmehr, who witnessed the exchange.

…The library is vulnerable to pressure from authorities because although the building sits on American and Canadian land, its entrance is on the U.S. side. U.S. officials allow staff and visitors from Canada to walk a few yards onto American soil without going through an official port of entry.

“Often there’s altercations with either RCMP or (U.S.) border security,” head librarian Joel Kerr said in a brief interview in early November, on a day in which two Iranian families reunited at the library. “They mostly harass us and threaten to shut us down.”

…The Iranians were mostly oblivious to signs stating in English and French that, by order of the library’s board of trustees, “family gatherings are not permitted.” Kerr said the signs had gone up just the week before.

Separated by travel ban, Iranian families reunite at border …

Jeezus…

Robert Mueller appears laser-focused on Roger Stone. These emails explain why. – ABC News

Stone instructed Corsi to contact Julian Assange, the controversial WikiLeaks founder, about the imminent release of information meant to damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign for president.

A third email suggests that Corsi — who Stone hired to conduct research in advance of the election – was successful in establishing a line of communication to Assange and later informed Stone of the pending release of information the special counsel has alleged was provided to WikiLeaks by a hacker with ties to Russian military intelligence, perhaps drawing a link between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives.

…The authenticity of the emails, provided to ABC News by a source with direct access to the exchanges, were confirmed by Stone and two separate sources. They also appear to match those cited by Mueller in a draft of a plea agreement Corsi told ABC News he was offered by the special counsel in exchange for his cooperation.

Robert Mueller appears laser-focused on Roger Stone. These emails explain why. – ABC News

hmmm

Manafort pardon would be impeachable, indictable and convictable

The case for obstruction of justice involving efforts to impede the Mueller investigation is far stronger, based on publicly known evidence, than our public discussion would suggest.

…It is now reported that Manafort was essentially double-dealing against Mueller and his investigators, with his lawyers allegedly reporting confidential information to Trump’s lawyers about his discussions with Mueller while he was supposedly cooperating with Mueller.

…Additionally, I would assert that while a president can lawfully pardon almost anyone, for almost any crime, a pardon could also be crucial evidence in support of an obstruction of justice case, and potentially an additional count in an obstruction of justice case.

If a pardon is offered to influence a witness in a criminal investigation, that pardon could indeed be a crime.

…Additionally, if Manafort is pardoned, he would almost immediately be required by Mueller to testify before a grand jury, under penalty of perjury, and would have to testify truthfully, or he would be indicted for new crimes of perjury that would not be covered by the pardon.

Manafort pardon would be impeachable, indictable and convictable | TheHill

hmmm

Pelosi shuts down critics in tense meeting

Democratic Reps. Kathleen Rice of New York, Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, and Tim Ryan of Ohio, want her to go, or at the very least commit to passing the gavel by a certain deadline. But Pelosi doesn’t feel like she needs to and isn’t even considering such a concession.

…Freshmen could be punished for backing her in 2020, they continued.

Pelosi, however, dismissed their argument entirely, vowing to help these incoming freshmen by raising them money to fend off any such attacks.

…Indeed, just an hour after she left that session, Pelosi won a strong show of support for her leadership during a Democratic Caucus meeting. …Pelosi handily won the House Democratic nomination to be speaker in a closed-door caucus meeting. She only lost 32 votes, well below the 63 who opposed her in caucus in 2016. 

…The current House minority leader has already demonstrated that she can pick off major players in the group of insurgents organizing against her, flipping Reps. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) and Brian Higgins (D-N.Y.) just before Thanksgiving. And she appears close to a deal with Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), who exited a meeting with Pelosi Wednesday expressing confidence in her ability to win the gavel.

…If the anti-Pelosi faction is able to block her on the House floor in January, the caucus — and the broader party apparatus beyond Capitol Hill — would devolve into chaos.

…“It’s not just about her. They want her to put a timeline on herself. That erodes the authority of the entire Democratic majority.”

Pelosi shuts down critics in tense meeting – POLITICO

hmmm

Pelosi balances commitments to progressives and moderates in path to speaker’s gavel

Dangling committee assignments, office budgets and promises to address certain issues in committee and on the House floor, Pelosi secured the support of the majority of the caucus and its new freshman class, from suburban moderates to fiery progressives supported by party activists.

..“It’s going to be necessary to have someone who has the experience to take on this administration, and fight back and make sure we have the checks and balances that are needed,” progressive Rep.-elect Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., told reporters after backing Pelosi.

…Pelosi offered Rep.-elect Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., a seat on the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force and a commitment to take up gun violence legislation in exchange for her support. She won over Rep.-elect Tom Malinowski, D-N.J., with a commitment to revisit the state and local tax deductions in the GOP tax reform bill, and secure federal funding for the Gateway Tunnel project linking New Jersey and New York City.

…Ocasio-Cortez was one of the many freshmen who supported Pelosi.

…Pelosi has made some inroads with moderates, striking a deal with nine Democrats who wanted changes to House rules to help facilitate bipartisan legislation… …which include giving preferential treatment to amendments with bipartisan support and the creation of a “consensus calendar” to bring up select bipartisan legislation stalled in committee, take little floor authority away from majority leadership.

Pelosi balances commitments to progressives and moderates in path to speaker’s gavel – ABC News

hmmmm

Last election of 2018 gives Democrats cause for hope in 2020 — and despair. Here’s why.

In particular, he seems to have benefited from a motivated black electorate. With some ballots still to be counted, turnout for the runoff has met or surpassed its Nov. 6 level in a dozen of the state’s 82 counties. And of those dozen counties, eight are majority-black, mostly in the Delta region, where Espy racked up enormous margins.

Espy’s statewide total was also helped by the suburbs, especially fast-growing DeSoto County, which abuts the Tennessee border and has become a hotspot for Memphis commuters. Here, Espy collected 41 percent of the vote, far better than recent Democratic candidates like Hillary Clinton (31 percent in 2016) and Barack Obama (33 percent in 2012, and 30 percent in 2008).

…[Espy] suffered in many heavily white rural areas, especially in the northeast corner of the state, where Hyde-Smith ran close to — and in a few cases even matched — the levels of support Donald Trump received in 2016.

Last election of 2018 gives Democrats cause for hope in 2020 — and despair. Here’s why.

hmmmm

Is Jeff Epstein Also Running A Ponzi Scheme? – Business Insider

There are still mysteries around the money manager’s sexual habits but perhaps not enough people are asking the question: is Epstein running a Ponzi scheme?

…[The] 2002 New York magazine piece on Epstein raises several red flags.

…This kind of secrecy and exclusivity, viewed in the light of Bernie Madoff, is at the very least suspicious.

Another red flag is the way the money is managed. In 2002, Epstein’s company reportedly had around 150 employees …but these employees are all said to be “administrative.” He reportedly employs no analysts, portfolio managers or traders. All of the investment decisions are said to be made by Epstein himself.

…Is there any other multi-billion-dollar financial company run this way?

[Hint: No.]

…Epstein reportedly only accepts investments of $1 billion or more. There aren’t many people out there who can place $1 billion with anyone, much less entrust it to a single individual. If this is a scam, we expect that Epstein lowers the billion bar for “friends” who are permitted to place much smaller sums with him.

[Or the high buy-in keeps intrusive eyes away because of the nature of it being out of reach for even those who are very, very rich. …Not to mention the mystique it creates.]

…Yet another red flag is that Epstein takes absolute control of the money, leaving investors with no options about how it is invested. According to rumors, he gives them little information about what he does with it.

…There are no SEC filings disclosing Epstein’s holdings. Not one. It’s hard to see how he could be managing billions without ever tripping a disclosure trigger, unless he avoids the stock market altogether and only invests in private deals. This is another red flag.

…But given the red flags and the fact that he reportedly controls billions of dollars, isn’t it something worth looking into?

Is Jeff Epstein Also Running A Ponzi Scheme? – Business Insider

hmmmm

The Talented Mr. Epstein | Vanity Fair

…No one really seems to know him or his history completely or what his arsenal actually consists of. He has carefully engineered [it that way.] People know snippets, but few know the whole.

“…He’s a classic iceberg. What you see is not what you get.”

…Under the mentorship of both Greenberg and current Bear Stearns C.E.O. James Cayne, he did well enough to become a limited partner—a rung beneath full partner. He abruptly departed in 1981 because, he has said, he wanted to run his own business.

…Several of Epstein’s Bear Stearns contemporaries recall that Epstein left the company very suddenly. Within the company there were rumors also that he was involved in a technical infringement, and it was thought that the executive committee asked that he resign.

…”Jeffrey said specifically, ‘I don’t want to work for anybody else. I want to work for myself.’” Yet, this is not the story that Epstein told to the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a civil business case in Philadelphia.

In 1981 the S.E.C. ..took Epstein’s testimony …in part of what became a protracted case about insider trading.

…An investment from Stroll of $450,000, which Epstein put into oil. In 1984 Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among other things, that the check for $10,000 was for a horse he’d bought from Stroll.

Though he has claimed that he managed money for billionaires only, in a 1989 deposition he testified that he spent 80 percent of his time assisting people recover stolen money from fraudulent brokers and lawyers.

One friend recalls that when he took Canadian heiress Wendy Belzberg on a date he hired a Rolls-Royce especially for the occasion. (Epstein has claimed he owned it.)

Some friends remember that in the late 80s Epstein would offer to upgrade the airline tickets of good friends by affixing first-class stickers; the only problem was that the stickers turned out to be unofficial. Sometimes the technique worked, but other times it didn’t, and the unwitting recipients found themselves exiled to coach. (Epstein has claimed that he paid for the upgrades, and had no knowledge of the stickers.)

[Snicker… Oh, come on!]

According to him, the flat fees he receives from his clients, combined with his skill at playing the currency markets “with very large sums of money,” have afforded him the lifestyle he enjoys today.

…Some of the businessmen who dine with him at his home …seem not all that clear as to what he actually does to earn his millions. …“The trading desks don’t seem to know him. It’s unusual for animals that big not to leave any footprints in the snow,” says a high-level investment manager.

…Since Leslie Wexner appeared in his life—Epstein has said this was in 1986; others say it was in 1989, at the earliest

[This story has a lot of holes and squishy spots, and Wexner’s a big one.]

Wexner, through a trust, bought the town house in which Epstein now lives for a reported $13.2 million in 1989. …Public documents suggest that the house is still owned by the trust that bought it, but Epstein has said that he now owns the house.

…The entrance hall is decorated not with paintings but with row upon row of individually framed eyeballs; these, the owner tells people with relish, 

[and nothing to back it up but his say-so]

…were imported from England, where they were made for injured soldiers. Next comes a marble foyer, which does have a painting, in the manner of Jean Dubuffet … but the host coyly refuses to tell visitors who painted it.

[It strikes the peanut gallery that if a conman was going to pass off a knock-off, being coy would be a good way to do it.]

…the house is curiously impersonal, the statement of someone who wants to be known for the scale of his possessions.

[no shit?]

… On the desk, a paperback copy of the Marquis de Sade’s The Misfortunes of Virtue was recently spotted.

[well, duh!]

…stuffed black poodle, standing atop the grand piano. “No decorator would ever tell you to do that,” Epstein brags to visitors. “But I want people to think what it means to stuff a dog.”

[Seriously? Stuff a dog? Come on! …And no, it actually doesn’t sound like he’s referring to getting the last word at all.]

His real mentor, it might seem, was not Leslie Wexner but Steven Jude Hoffenberg, 57, who …is currently incarcerated in the Federal Medical Center in Devens, Massachusetts, serving a 20-year sentence for bilking investors out of more than $450 million in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in American history.

[OK, now we’re getting somewhere…]

…“He ‘inserted’ himself into the construction process of Leslie Wexner’s yacht…. That resulted in litigation down the road between Mr. Wexner and the shipyard that eventually built the vessel.” ..Evidently, Epstein stalled on paying Dickerson and Reily for its work. “It’s probably once or twice in my legal career that I’ve had to sue a client for payment of services that he’d requested and we’d performed … without issue on the performance,” says Forsberg. In the end the matter was settled, but Epstein claims he now has no recollection of it.

[How very Ponzi of him.]

 …Citibank is suing Epstein for defaulting on loans from its private-banking arm for $20 million. Epstein claims that Citibank “fraudulently induced” him into borrowing the money for investments. Citibank disputes this charge.

 

…Epstein’s financial statement for 1988, in which he claimed to be worth $20 million. He listed that he owned $7 million in securities, $1 million in cash, zero in residential property (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and $11 million in other assets, including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: “The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt, and it wasn’t public, so it was meaningless to attach a figure like that to it … the price it cost was about $1.2 million.” The co-investors bought out Epstein’s share in Riddell in 1995 for approximately $3 million. At that time, when Epstein was asked, as a routine matter, to sign a paper guaranteeing he had access to a few million dollars in case of any subsequent disputes over the sale price, Wexner signed for him. Epstein has explained that this was because the co-investors wanted an indemnity against being sued by Wexner. One of the investors calls this “bullshit.”

The Talented Mr. Epstein | Vanity Fair

Bullshit indeed. [All emphasis: mine]

Orgy Island Billionaire Epstein Light Sentence — Today Details Were Released on His Widespread Child Sex Abuse

Robert Mueller’s FBI Gave Orgy Island Billionaire Epstein Light Sentence — Today Details Were Released on His Widespread Child Sex Abuse – Blunt Force Truth

Conservatives are so adorable, aren’t they?

Was that Mueller’s FBI (which wasn’t actually Mueller’s FBI at the time but I don’t want to confuse the conservatives among you with such pesky and troublesome details!) or was that Trump’s Acosta? Oh, yeah… That’s right! The FBI was pursuing a case when Acosta and his accomplices shut it down. Details and facts are so tricky for nouveau Conservatives to keep straight!

Kushner makes White House policy power play

Rollins’ ascension at the DPC would give Kushner a foothold in an often unsung corner of the White House, which coordinates policy areas including education, transportation, housing, labor and health care. Over the past two years, the council has developed changes to the Affordable Care Act, crafted an executive order on welfare reform and played a key role in several legislative debates such as the farm bill, prison reform and an effort to rein in drug prices.

…The hottest policy issue under the purview of the Domestic Policy Council has been immigration, but senior adviser Stephen Miller has entirely co-opted that process and runs it independent of DPC staffers, said one former White House official.

…Under this approach, Miller would take over all immigration policy, formalizing a role he’s long played in this White House as Trump’s top immigration guru. Rollins could take over the remaining set of domestic issues, giving Kushner, by proxy, influence in yet another part of the West Wing.

Kushner makes White House policy power play – POLITICO

hmmm

New York Mag’s take on Jeffrey Epstein in 2002: International Moneyman of Mystery

In 1982, according to those who know Epstein, he set up his own shop, J. Epstein and Co., which remains his core business today. The premise behind it was simple: Epstein would manage the individual and family fortunes of clients with $1 billion or more. Which is where the mystery deepens. Because according to the lore, Epstein, in 1982, immediately began collecting clients. There were no road shows, no whiz-bang marketing demos — just this: Jeff Epstein was open for business for those with $1 billion–plus.

His firm would be different, too. He was not here just to offer investment advice; he saw himself as the financial architect of every aspect of his client’s wealth — from investments to philanthropy to tax planning to security to assuaging the guilt and burdens that large sums of inherited wealth can bring on. “I want people to understand the power, the responsibility, and the burden of their money,” he said to a colleague at the time.

As a teacher at Dalton, he had witnessed firsthand the troubled attitudes of some of the poor little rich kids under his charge; at Bear, he had come to the realization that, counterintuitively, the more money you had, the more anxious you became. For a middle-class kid from Brooklyn, it just didn’t make sense.

From the get-go, his business was successful. But the conditions for investing with Epstein were steep: He would take total control of the billion dollars, charge a flat fee, and assume power of attorney to do whatever he thought was necessary to advance his client’s financial cause. And he remained true to the $1 billion entry fee. According to people who know him, if you were worth $700 million and felt the need for the services of Epstein and Co., you would receive a not-so-polite no-thank-you from Epstein.

It’s nice work if you can get it. Epstein runs a lean operation, and those close to him say that his actual staff — based here in Manhattan at the Villard House (home to Le Cirque); New Albany, Ohio; and St. Thomas, where he reincorporated his company seven years ago (now called Financial Trust Co.) — numbers around 150 and is purely administrative. When it comes to putting these billions to work in the markets, it is Epstein himself making all the investment calls — there are no analysts or portfolio managers, just twenty accountants to keep the wheels greased and a bevy of assistants — many of them conspicuously attractive young women — to organize his hectic life. So assuming, conservatively, a fee of .5 percent (he takes no commissions or percentages) on $15 billion, that makes for a management fee of $75 million a year straight into Jeff Epstein’s pocket. Nice work indeed.

….It’s a weird relationship,” says another Wall Streeter who knows Epstein. “It’s just not typical for someone of such enormous wealth to all of a sudden give his money to some guy most people have never heard of.” The Wexner-Epstein relationship is indeed a multifaceted one.

Given the secrecy that envelops Epstein’s client list, some have speculated that Wexner is the primary source of Epstein’s lavish life — but friends leap to his defense. “Let me tell you: Jeffrey Epstein has other clients besides Wexner. I know because some of them are my clients,” says noted m&a lawyer Dennis Block of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. “I sent him a $500 million client a few years ago and he wouldn’t take him. Said the account was too small. Both the client and I were amazed. But that’s Jeffrey.”

…Again, facts are hard to come by. [Speaking of which, where did the author get all of this info???] A working day for Epstein starts at 5 a.m., when he gets up and scours the world markets on his Bloomberg screen — each of his houses, in New York, St. Thomas, Palm Beach, and New Mexico, as well as the 727, is equipped with the necessary hardware for him to wake up, roll out of bed, and start trading. He will put some calls in to his private banker at JPMorgan to get a reading as to how wealthy investors — the best gauge of market sentiment, he believes — are reacting to the market’s movements. Then he will call currency traders in Europe. On a given day, he will spend ten hours or so on the phone — after all, he is running $15 billion essentially by himself.

Strangely enough, given his scientific obsessions, he is a computer-phobe and does not use e-mail. “I like to hear voices and see faces when I interact,” he has said.

…Given the huge sums he has to invest, he focuses on assets with extremely high liquidity, like currencies — though he dabbles in commodities and real estate as well. Those who know him say he is an impulsive, quick-to-change-his-mind trader, still governed by Ace Greenberg’s trader’s maxim: If the stock is down 10 percent, sell it. He has been on the short side of the Brazilian real, and those close to him say bets there have paid off in spades. He recently took a long position on the euro before its rebound on the basis that Europeans were too proud to see their currency sink any lower against the dollar. His next targets: an across-the-board short of the German stock exchange and a possible attack on the Hong Kong dollar peg in light of the recent disclosure of North Korea’s nuclear-weapons program.

Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery

The fawning him in this article is a hoot viewed through the lens of 20/20 hindsight. Interesting (and apparently unsubstantiated) details about how Epstein made his money is interesting though. A contrived fairy tale, with glimmeringly romantic details which simply do not add up.

Wexner just gave him the largest residence in NYC?

Those who know him? Like who? The PR stunt folks who delivered these details to the author for this story?

Conveniently there is no paper trail or email to support any of these fanciful notions of an investment wunderkind?

Come on!