Are we really going to blame USWNT players for scoring, celebrating goals?

But to put blame on the United States ignores two obvious points. First, the Americans didn’t make the rules under which the number of goals scored is part of deciding the outcome of the tournament. Goal differential counts. The U.S. women want to win its group. Unlike just about any other sport, the Americans have a vested interest in running up the score.

And second, it isn’t the United States’ fault it can’t clear its bench. It is allowed three subs. It used three subs.

…But beyond that, why is it the obligation of the U.S. team to act in the interest of creating a picture of a falsely level playing field? Why shouldn’t FIFA or the Asian Confederation get blamed for not doing more to promote the women’s game in places where it lags behind?

Are we really going to blame players for celebrating a goal, in many cases in their first World Cup, instead of looking at the underlying reasons for the disparity in the first place?

Women’s World Cup 2019 – Are we really going to blame USWNT players for scoring, celebrating goals?

To answer the question posed in the headline:

As long as it is a team composed of women? Apparently yes, we are.

Meet the gallant all-black American female battalion that served in Europe during World War II

Meet the gallant all-black American female battalion that served in Europe during World War II – Face2Face Africa

A wee bit of credibility was compromised with the assertion that the first women to dress up as men so they could serve were in the American Civil War but still, an interesting bit of history.

Who White Democrats Vote For In 2020 Could Be Shaped By Why They Think Clinton Lost

We found no statistically significant shifts in men’s candidate preferences. One reason women might be disproportionately likely to change the way they think about the next election cycle is that gender norms call on them to be accommodating, and those norms influence people’s political decision-making.

Who White Democrats Vote For In 2020 Could Be Shaped By Why They Think Clinton Lost | FiveThirtyEight

Oy… That’s the best fivethirtyeight can come with? unsubstantiated conjecture?
if we’re being gossipy about things, how about taking into account the high number of men who were already sold on the idea of identity politics before they entered the study? No taking those numbers into account or discussing what gender norms might be at play there?

Weak.

Abortion law: Republican and conservative women don’t all agree

“Republicans don’t have fewer abortions than Democrats or liberals or anarchists or communists. It’s that our political rhetoric paints people who have abortions as largely the same – poor women, young women, irresponsible women, women who hate children,” said Amanda Reyes, president of the Yellowhammer Fund, which provides funding for women seeking access to any of Alabama’s three abortion clinics. “It’s gotten us to a point where we can’t see the fact that we’re all having abortions, and we’re doing it for reasons we personally think matter – and that’s all that matters. Pro-life women are having abortions, too.”

…Polling shows about a third of Republicans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, according to the Pew Research Center, and more than half of Republican women support keeping Roe v. Wade, according to a poll in 2018 from the nonpartisan public opinion research firm PerryUndem. Nearly 90% of voters say they would support a friend or family member if they had an abortion.

…Roberts had five more children (though she eventually split from her husband) and considered herself anti-abortion until the day she found herself in a Planned Parenthood clinic seeking an abortion. An ultrasound revealed her pregnancy was not viable, and she was told she would miscarry. 

“I realized then I’m not actually better or different,” she said. “I was sitting in the waiting room with all of these women who were just as scared as me. None of us looked like we wanted to be there. Some looked ready to get it over with. Life brought us to be at this spot, on this day, and it wasn’t a value judgment.”

Roberts co-founded the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, an organization that helps fund abortion access in Mississippi, primarily serving low-income black women. Mississippi has one abortion clinic. 

Roberts said most of the women she takes calls from are religious. 

Abortion law: Republican and conservative women don’t all agree

hmmmmmmmm

Trump quietly shuts down HIV cure research to appease the religious right

A “pause” on research that uses aborted fetal tissue, something Christian conservatives strongly oppose, was announced by the Trump administration this past September. The move will affect numerous biomedical research programs.

Congressional Republicans have tried to ban all fetal tissue research for years to appease the religious right. 85 Republican House members wrote a letter to the head of the FDA asking for a ban on fetal tissue research shortly before the “pause” was announced.

…Earlier this year, the Department of Health and Human Services announced a new Conscience and Religious Freedom Division that would handle complaints from health care providers who did not want to take part in an abortion or treat transgender people.

Trump quietly shuts down HIV cure research to appease the religious right / LGBTQ Nation

Aggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Kansas Supreme Court: Abortion now a constitutional right in state

The court said the Kansas Constitution gives women the right to make their own decisions regarding their bodies. That means abortions would be legal in Kansas even if Roe v. Wade is reversed at the federal level.

“Our Supreme Court had not made a ruling in that regard until today,” said Robert Eye, a lawyer who represents two abortion doctors in the Supreme Court case.

Kansas Supreme Court: Abortion now a constitutional right in state

hmmm

How Banning Abortion Will Transform America into Something akin to Soviet states.

A century of evidence from around the worldshows that coercive reproduction policies correlate weakly with actual fertility rates. The fact is that women’s decisions about family size are based on material realities. When basic food supplies are scarce (as in Romania in the 1980s), women will risk their lives having back-alley abortions, for fear of lacking the means to care for a child. Where paid parental leave and childcare are absent or prohibitively expensive, as they are in the US, women will make similar economic choices, regardless of the laws on the books.

After communism, Romania’s people recognized that democratic societies have a responsibility to guarantee women’s bodily autonomy, and to respect the right of all citizens to make their own decisions about whether and when to start or add to a family. It is odd that in the “land of the free,” one of the major parties would emulate a communist dictator.

How Banning Abortion Will Transform America by Maria Bucur & Kristen R. Ghodsee – Project Syndicate

hmmmmm