SF will wipe thousands of marijuana convictions off the books

San Francisco will retroactively apply California’s marijuana-legalization laws to past criminal cases, District Attorney George Gascón said Wednesday — expunging or reducing misdemeanor and felony convictions going back decades.

The unprecedented move will affect thousands of people whose marijuana convictions brand them with criminal histories that can hurt chances of finding jobs and obtaining some government benefits.

Proposition 64, which state voters passed in November 2016, legalized the recreational use of marijuana in California for those 21 and older and permitted the possession up to 1 ounce of cannabis. The legislation also allows those with past marijuana convictions that would have been lesser crimes — or no crime at all — under Prop. 64 to petition a court to recall or dismiss their cases.

Rather than leaving it up to individuals to petition the courts — which is time-consuming and can cost hundreds of dollars in attorney fees — Gascón said San Francisco prosecutors will review and wipe out convictions en masse.

SF will wipe thousands of marijuana convictions off the books – SFGate

hmmmm

Manchester police officer collapses minutes before expected guilty plea in hit-and-run

Manchester police officer collapses minutes before expected guilty plea in hit-and-run | New Hampshire

Another big bad cop turns out to be a weak, spineless wuss.

Think of all the people he treated without humanity or compassion and here he is breaking down like a little child in the face of consequences for his own actions. Typical.

7-year-old boy handcuffed in Florida school after allegedly attacking teacher

7-year-old boy handcuffed in Florida school after allegedly attacking teacher – ABC News

1.) If an adult wants to press charges against a 7 year old child they do not have the cognitive ability necessary to function as an adult.

2.) If an adult cannot control a 7 year old child they should not be in a position where they are charged with the care of children.

3.) If an officer of the law thinks it is appropriate to handcuff and arrest a seven year old, they should surrender their badge and gun immediately because their poor judgement is a danger to the community they are employed to serve and protect.

Period.

Larry Nassar Complained About Listening To Survivor Statements And Judge Aquilina Wasn’t Having It

Ex-Team USA Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar was sentenced to up to 175 years in prison on Tuesday, after more than 150 women and girls came forward to accuse him of sexually abusing them.

[Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie] Aquilina called issuing the sentence a “privilege,” adding: “I just signed your death warrant.” 

Aquilina has been praised on social media for focusing on the survivors over the last few days. When one survivor, Amanda Cormier, explained that she loved to write songs as a teenager, but that she hadn’t written one since the abuse, Aquilina gave some advice to the woman and her unborn baby:

“It seems to me, after this, you can finish writing. You found your voice,” Aquilina said. “It’s a strong, effective, brave voice, and you have a child coming. Maybe what you need to do is start and finish a lullaby.”

…Nassar wrote to a letter to the judge, complaining that he was unable to handle the continued victim impact statements because of his mental state, and which contained the phrase: “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” 

…”You need to talk about these issues with a therapist,” the judge told Nassar. “Contrary to CNN’s headline, I’m not a therapist.” Moments later, she threw the letter onto the ground.

Larry Nassar Complained About Listening To Survivor Statements And Judge Aquilina Wasn’t Having It

Justice served.

Louisiana teacher handcuffed, arrested after bringing up brass salary at school board meeting

Louisiana teacher handcuffed, arrested after bringing up brass salary at school board meeting – NBC News

Jeezus Kerrreyst…. Clearly some of the individuals involved need to be put in handcuffs and dropped into the swampy morass that is the Louisiana justice system but the teacher is not in that group….

New Hampshire police officers colluded with federal officers to circumvent state law.

The question: Can federal officers conduct a search that is prohibited under New Hampshire law, then turn over the evidence to state police so that state prosecutors can file charges in state court?

New Hampshire police officers colluded with federal officers to circumvent state law.

Answer: Not without spitting on the laws of the country and state they are operating in.

Right of feds to make drug arrests at I-93 immigration roadblocks challenged

District Court Judge Thomas Rappa is considering whether to dismiss state drug charges against 16 people stopped at federal Border Patrol immigration checkpoints on Interstate 93 in Woodstock in August and September.

Three Border Patrol canine handlers testified they had legal grounds to conduct a search of the vehicles involved. Because the amount of contraband was below Border Patrol guidelines for prosecution, the handlers said the materials were handed over to Woodstock police.

Gilles Bissonnette, legal director of the NH American Civil Liberties Union, said the Border Patrol could have brought charges in federal court, but chose not to. In choosing to delegate to the Woodstock Police Department, Border Patrol should have followed state law — which would have required search warrants, he said.

Bissonnette told Rappa that what the state was trying to say that the entire state of New Hampshire — because all of it is within the 100-mile zone in which Border Patrol has authority — is subject to warrantless searches.

Right of feds to make drug arrests at I-93 immigration roadblocks challenged | New Hampshire

hmmm

House Extends Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Privacy Safeguards

House Extends Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Privacy Safeguards – The New York Times

Because the new-orwellian American leadership does not give a shit about your rights or individual liberties. They want personal profit and privilege and ideals like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are unwanted complications.

Buckle up kids, the Party of small government and personal liberty is buying and selling the right to control every aspect of your life. For personal profit.

Inmates Can’t Receive Donated Books Anymore, They Have to Buy Them

The selection is limited. And expensive.

…When there were five vendors, 77 books were available for purchase and 24 of the titles were coloring books.

Inmates Can’t Receive Donated Books Anymore, They Have to Buy Them – WNYC News – WNYC

Sigh….

Let’s just be honest here, as a society we have given up on reforming individuals and chosen to incarcerate as many people as possible for as long as possible in conditions that guarantee recidivism and exclusion from opportunities for change and reform so that a select few can make an ungodly amount of money from the system.

Efforts underway to provide N.H. crime victims with constitutional rights

New Hampshire is one of 15 states that does not extend enumerated rights to victims of crime. A national effort that has now reached New Hampshire is looking to change that, so all crime victims – including surviving family members of murder victims – have equal rights as criminal defendants under the state constitution.

Efforts underway to provide N.H. crime victims with constitutional rights

hmmm

Fiancee: Man shot dead by cop was running away and posed no threat to the officer at the time

Fiancee: Man shot dead by cop was running away at the time

Jeezus Kerrreyest… The trooper involved should have known better. Disrespecting an officer of the law or not following an order from a an officer of the law is not cause for cold blooded murder.

The officers needs to lose their badge – both immediately and permanently – and serve time for murder one. If the citizenry id not given the benefit of the doubt in life or death events like these, then the officers of law do not deserve anything other than the cold, unforgiving justice that they seem to think they are entitled to mete out.

Police kill a man at his home while responding to a fake call

Police kill a man at his home while responding to a fake call – CNN

CNN describes this incidents as if it is a gaming prank gone wrong. It is not. It is yet another example of police incompetence and murder without cause.

All of the officers involved showed such poor judgement that they pose a clear and present danger to the citizens they are sworn to protect. All of them should lose their badges – immediately- and face charges for the home invasion, the murders, and the reckless damage that they caused.

There is no excuse for officers of the law acting without regard to the safety of the citizenry. They are paid to act after they have established the facts, not shoot people whenever they feel like it. If they can not exercise good, logical, sound judgment while performing their duties they should not be in the uniform in the first place.

In addition to the criminal charge that everyone involved should face, I hope the entire department and each individual officer involved is sued into bankruptcy.

FBI Affidavit Details Ex-Sheriff David Clarke’s Intimidation Of Fellow Passenger

FBI Affidavit Details Ex-Sheriff David Clarke’s Intimidation Of Fellow Passenger | HuffPost

This is why we can’t have nice things.

…And a glaring example of the lawlessness and bullying that so typifies American law enforcement in this day an age. The former Sheriff and the officers involved should be in jail for illegally detaining this man, harassment and intimidation.

If officers of the law do not face severe consequences for flaunting the law they will continue to murder, harass, and intimidate the citizenry like the thugs that so many of them so clearly are.

‘What Are We Going to Do About Tyler?’

Tyler Haire was locked up at 16. A Mississippi judge ordered that he undergo a mental exam. What happened next is a statewide scandal.

…During his childhood, Tyler had been found to be suffering from seven different mental disorders, the first diagnosis coming when he was just four years old; he had threatened to bomb his school; he had chased his two siblings with a knife trying to stab them; his family suspected that he’d strangled a cat to death with his bare hands; he’d been hospitalized on several occasions and later placed in a home for troubled boys.

The local prosecutor joined the defense lawyer’s request for an evaluation, and Judge John A. Gregory immediately signed an order to have Tyler assessed at the state hospital in Whitfield to determine if Tyler had a factual and rational understanding of the legal proceeding against him, as well as whether, at the time of the non-fatal assault, he knew the “difference between right and wrong.”

“It is therefore ordered and adjudged,” Gregory wrote on April 23, 2013, “that the defendant Tyler Douglas Haire be given a mental evaluation at the earliest possible date.”

Tyler’s evaluation would not happen for three and a half years.

During the 1,266 days Tyler spent in the Calhoun County jail before he received his evaluation, he was never once visited by a psychiatrist. He went without any of the multiple drugs he had taken as a boy. He received no educational instruction.

‘What Are We Going to Do About Tyler?’

sigh…

Rigged: How Voter Suppression Threw Wisconsin to Trump

She’d lost her driver’s license a few days earlier, but she came prepared with an expired Wisconsin state ID and proof of residency. A poll worker confirmed she was registered to vote at her current address. But this was Wisconsin’s first major election that required voters—even those who were already registered—to present a current driver’s license, passport, or state or military ID to cast a ballot. Anthony couldn’t, and so she wasn’t able to vote.

The poll worker gave her a provisional ballot instead. It would be counted only if she went to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get a new ID and then to the city clerk’s office to confirm her vote, all within 72 hours of Election Day. But Anthony couldn’t take time off from her job as an administrative assistant at a housing management company, and she had five kids and two grandkids to look after. For the first time in her life, her vote wasn’t counted.

…“I felt like the right to vote was being stripped away from me.”

…Clinton’s stunning loss in Wisconsin was blamed on her failure to campaign in the state, and the depressed turnout was attributed to a lack of enthusiasm for either candidate.

…The impact of Wisconsin’s voter ID law received almost no attention. When it did, it was often dismissive.

…Voter suppression efforts were practically ignored, when they weren’t mocked.

…when the measure was challenged in court, the state couldn’t present a single case of voter impersonation that the law would have stopped. “It is absolutely clear that [the law] will prevent more legitimate votes from being cast than fraudulent votes,” Judge Lynn Adelman wrote in a 2014 decision striking down the law. Adelman’s ruling was overturned by a conservative appeals court panel.

…After the election, registered voters in Milwaukee County and Madison’s Dane County were surveyed about why they didn’t cast a ballot. Eleven percent cited the voter ID law and said they didn’t have an acceptable ID; of those, more than half said the law was the “main reason” they didn’t vote.

…Its impact was particularly acute in Milwaukee, where nearly two-thirds of the state’s African Americans live, 37 percent of them below the poverty line.

…A post-election study by Priorities USA, a Democratic super-PAC that supported Clinton, found that in 2016, turnout decreased by 1.7 percent in the three states that adopted stricter voter ID laws but increased by 1.3 percent in states where ID laws did not change. Wisconsin’s turnout dropped 3.3 percent. If Wisconsin had seen the same turnout increase as states whose laws stayed the same, “we estimate that over 200,000 more voters would have voted in Wisconsin in 2016,” the study said. These “lost voters”—those who voted in 2012 and 2014 but not 2016—”skewed more African American and more Democrat” than the overall voting population.

…Under the terms of a court order resulting from ongoing litigation over the voter ID law, within six business days the DMV should have given Moore a credential he could use for voting. Instead, a clerk told him to go down to Illinois, get his birth certificate, and come back to the DMV. That would cost Moore money he didn’t have. If he entered Wisconsin’s ID Petition Process, it would take six to eight weeks for him to get a voter ID and he most likely would not be able to vote on Election Day.

…It might be tempting to chalk up interactions like Moore’s to the general hellish nature of a trip to the DMV. But by this point, there was already plenty of evidence that Wisconsin’s shoddy implementation of the law was a feature, not a bug.

…It wasn’t just poor African Americans who were disenfranchised. Most college IDs were not accepted under the law because they didn’t require signatures or have the state-mandated two-year expiration date—a criterion that made little sense at four-year schools. Only 3 of the 13 four-year schools in the University of Wisconsin system had IDs compliant with the new law.

That meant many schools, including UW-Madison, had to issue separate IDs for students to use only for voting, an expensive and confusing process for students and administrators. In addition to needing these new IDs to vote, students at private colleges and universities had to bring them to register to vote as well, in addition to a proof-of-enrollment form. (Public university students needed either the ID or the proof of enrollment.)* There were more than 13,000 out-of-state students at UW-Madison alone who were eligible to vote but couldn’t do so without going through this byzantine process if they lacked a Wisconsin driver’s license or state ID. (UW-Madison ultimately issued more than 7,300 voter IDs for the 2016 general election.)

…Wisconsin’s Legislature cut early voting from 30 days to 12, reduced early voting hours on nights and weekends, and restricted early voting to one location per municipality, hampering voters in large urban areas and sprawling rural ones.* It also added new residency requirements for voter registration, eliminated staffers who led statewide registration drives, and made it harder to count absentee ballots.

Rigged: How Voter Suppression Threw Wisconsin to Trump – Mother Jones

1.) No shit, Sherlock?
2.) Agggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhh!

Did Alabama Just Violate Federal Voting Law?

A multitude of voters—most of them in majority-black counties—struggled to cast their ballots in the race between Roy Moore and Doug Jones. Unprepared poll workers spread misinformation. Bewildered citizens were forced to fill out confusing, redundant paperwork. Qualified voters were told they could not vote. And the state may well have run afoul of federal law.

…many voters were in fact told they were inactive even though they voted in 2016 and have lived at the same address for years. There is no legal reason why these individuals should have been considered inactive.

…These voters’ inactivity wouldn’t be a serious snag if poll workers, and the secretary of state, dealt with it correctly. …Under state law, inactive voters can become active and cast a regular ballot once they reidentify themselves, which should be as easy as presenting their photo IDs. (Alabama requires an ID to vote.) But on Tuesday, these voters were compelled to fill out a lengthy, complex form that required them to list, among other things, their county of birth.

…Poll workers [claimed to be] uncertain whether they could accept reidentification forms from inactive voters who forgot the county in which they were born. Others gave inactive voters provisional ballots even if they filled out the entire reidentification form correctly. …In Montgomery County alone …as many as 40 inactive voters who properly reidentified themselves were forced to cast provisional ballots. And at least one poll worker in Tallapoosa County reportedly informed a man in the inactive list that he could not vote at all.

…In Democratic-leaning, majority-black Jefferson County, …police were stationed outside of a polling place pulling people over for making illegal turns. Officers held at least one woman, who was on her way to vote, for nearly an hour while writing her up. [In Jefferson County] police were stationed at the polling place checking IDs for outstanding warrants, a once-common voter suppression scheme. When election monitors dropped by the precinct shortly thereafter, the police promptly left.

The United States is the only developed country in which these kinds of problems consistently plague elections.

Did Alabama Just Violate Federal Voting Law?

Short answer? Yes.

Man critically wounded by officers inside Mpls. City Hall

The man “began injuring himself with an edged weapon,” Arradondo said. After trying to subdue the man, “officers discharged their weapons.”

Man critically wounded by officers inside Mpls. City Hall – StarTribune.com

So they shot him to stop him from hurting himself? forget desk duty or suspension. These officers pose a clear and present danger to the safety of the citizens they are charged with protecting.

Such poor judgement should be cause for immediate firing, loss of any all pension and benefits, and prosecution for assault with a deadly weapon and attempted murder.

Anything else is an insult to the concept of law and order.

Walter Scott’s killer is going to prison. But his case is an anomaly.

Juries just don’t like to convict cops.

…A former Arizona police officer was acquitted after shooting and killing unarmed Daniel Shaver. Those who have seen the body-cam footage describe the shooting as an execution. Also this week, NYPD officers shot and killed a 69-year-old man during a 4 a.m. raid. The police were looking for a 30-year-old man on drug and gun charges. A 90-year-old man who was also in the apartment said the two thought they were being robbed. And in Los Angeles, we learned this week that more than 300 sheriff’s deputies are on a secret misconduct list for offenses ranging from lying under oath to domestic violence to possible sexual assault. But thanks to union-negotiated rules, that list is kept secret from the public, from defense attorneys and even from prosecutors. ….Deputies on the list never criminally charged.

…Officers severely wounded the man and nearly killed him. He lost the use of several organs and is paralyzed. Ballistics testing showed that police claims that the man had fired a gun at them were wrong — the gun hadn’t been fired. Surveillance video then emerged that contradicted police claims to have knocked and announced multiple times before battering down the man’s door. None of the officers associated with the raid were ever disciplined.

…In another incident, a police officer stopped a man after claiming the man activated his turn signal too late. Dash-cam footage shows that this was false. After a few minutes, the officer beat the man, then arrested him. The man was then subjected to numerous medical procedures without his consent. A prosecutor later dismissed all charges against the man. Not only were the officers involved never disciplined, but one was later promoted.

A South Carolina police officer shot and killed a 70-year-old man after mistaking his gun for a cane. The officer was never charged.

…In the police shooting of Lori Jean Ellis, forensic evidence directly contradicted police accounts of events leading up to the shooting. Yet investigators from the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) — the agency that investigates such shootings — never looked into the discrepancies. One supervising agent said he didn’t need to, “because they’re police officers and I believe what they’re telling me.” …[Another] admitted under oath that he doesn’t even always read the full forensics reports from officer-involved shootings.

Walter Scott’s killer is going to prison. But his case is an anomaly. – The Washington Post

Until officers of the law face consequences for the violent and cold-blooded crimes they commit there will never be peace or “rule of law” in this country.