The centre holds: Geert Wilders’s anti-immigration party does worse than expected in the Dutch election 

The Netherlands now faces lengthy haggling before a government based on dozens of compromises can take shape. In other words, Dutch politics as usual—just what Mr Wilders and his followers despise. The anti-immigrant right had hoped the row with Turkey would help them reframe the election as a battle between the Netherlands and Islam. Instead, it handed Mr Rutte control of the agenda.

The centre holds: Geert Wilders’s anti-immigration party does worse than expected in the Dutch election | The Economist

hmmm

High heels row: MPs ‘shocked’ by women’s dress code stories 

A petition that calls for a ban on forcing women to wear high heels at work is debated by MPs.

…MPs said they were “shocked” by stories submitted as part of the inquiry, which included one case of a woman who had been told to dye her hair blonde.

The government has said no employer should discriminate on gender grounds.

…Helen Jones, who chairs the Petitions Committee, said : “It is fair to say that what we found shocked us.

“We found attitudes that belonged more [to the] – I was going to say 1950s but probably the 1850s might be more accurate – than the 21st Century.

…Women should not be expected to wear things that caused discomfort or expense that a male colleague would not, she added.

“I must reiterate that the government utterly condemns such dress requirements where their effects are discriminatory.”

High heels row: MPs ‘shocked’ by women’s dress code stories – BBC News

hmmmm

Angela Merkel and European leaders resist Donald Trump’s ultimatum to increase defence spending or risk losing US commitment to Nato

European leaders have pushed back at Donald Trump’s ultimatum that they increase defence spending or risk America scaling back its commitment to Transatlantic protection.

Angela Merkel and European leaders resist Donald Trump’s ultimatum to increase defence spending or risk losing US commitment to Nato

hmmmm

Sweden asks the U.S. to explain Trump comment 

The Swedish embassy in Washington has asked the U.S. State Department for an explanation of a comment made by President Donald Trump that suggested there had been some sort of security incident in Sweden on Friday.

…Former Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt also took to Twitter, saying: “Sweden? Terror attack? What has he been smoking? Questions abound.

Sweden asks the U.S. to explain Trump comment | Reuters

I’m not convinced Trump comprehends the words that come out of his mouth. Especially the big ones.

5 important stories you may have missed during last week’s news deluge NewsHour

In honor of Patriots quarterback Tom Brady’s five Super Bowl wins, here are five stories that ought to get more attention.

1. Worst fighting in years flares up in Ukraine
2. An inquiry into child abuse allegations in Australia’s Catholic Church leads to “tragic” statistics
3. The world’s most endangered marine mammal is going extinct
4. Taiwan one step closer to legalizing same-sex marriage
5. FCC’s latest move complicates efforts to lessen the digital divide

5 important stories you may have missed during last week’s news deluge | PBS NewsHour

hmmmmm

 

What Those Who Studied Nazis Can Teach Us About Reactions To Trump 

“The problem, the personal problem, was not what our enemies did, but what our friends did. Friends ‘coordinated’ or got in line.” And this coordination was not necessarily due to the “pressure of terror,” said Arendt, who escaped Germany in 1933. Intellectuals were particularly vulnerable to this wave of coordination. “The essence of being an intellectual is that one fabricates ideas about everything,” and many intellectuals of her time were “trapped by their own ideas.”

People rejected the uglier aspects of Nazism but gave ground in ways that ultimately made it successful. They conceded premises to faulty arguments. They rejected the “facts” of propaganda, but not the impressions of it. The new paradigm of authoritarianism was so disorienting that they simply could not see it for what it was, let alone confront it.

…Trump’s propaganda about Mexican rapists and Muslim terrorists operates in a similar way. The informed listener knows that most rapes are committed by perpetrators that are known to the victim. They know that most terrorist attacks in the United States are committed by non-Muslims, but the impression that those groups are not to be trusted ― that to trust them is taking an unnecessary risk ― remains.

The impressions born of the propaganda give birth to discussions that worsen the problem. Commentator Van Jones, for example, debated CNN panelists recently about discrimination against Muslims. To support his argument that Muslims are not the enemy, he cataloged many of the positive attributes of the Muslim community as if Americans that are hostile to Muslims are acting in good faith based on bad information rather than cherry-picking incidents to support their underlying prejudices. Jones reminded viewers and other panelists that Muslims have low crime rates, high educational achievement and high rates of entrepreneurship. The fact that it needs to be said demonstrates the relative power of the people asking the questions to those who must answer. It morphs questions about Muslims into a kind of Muslim Question that exists not to seek answers but to emphasize the otherness of the Muslim community and to limit its rights.

…Joachim Fest writes in his memoir Not I, “At first, the countless violations of the law by our new rulers still caused a degree of disquiet. But among the incomprehensible features of those months, my father later recalled, was the fact that soon life went on as if such state crimes were the most natural thing in the world.”

What Those Who Studied Nazis Can Teach Us About The Strange Reaction To Donald Trump | The Huffington Post

Aghhhhhh