Yes, Replacing Food Stamps With a Blue Apron-Style Delivery System Is As Bad As It Sounds – Talk Poverty

aggghhhhhh!!!!

Hannity explicitly stated that he was never represented by nor had he ever retained Cohen. He bent over backwards to deny the relationship, claiming nothing more than a few harmless chit-chats over real estate.

…Although he later clarified his comments to suggest that he expected that some of his conversations with Cohen would be confidential, his earlier denial that a relationship ever existed renders that expectation unpersuasive. It is gratuitous doublespeak.

Hannity’s denial fatally undermined any credible claim by Cohen that their communications were protected from disclosure by the attorney client privilege. The privilege extends to only those private conversations that take place within an established attorney-client relationship, and even then, those conversations must specifically pertain to legal advice. The privilege does not extend to conversations simply because one of its participants happens to be an attorney.

…Even if Cohen wanted to disclose the discussions, he would only be allowed to do so if Hannity agreed to it.

But in this case, Hannity isn’t asserting the privilege, so Cohen lacks any basis not to disclose the information or to prevent the government from looking at any communications between himself and Hannity.

Sean Hannity news is a real problem for Michael Cohen (Opinion) – CNN

hmmmm

Reporters and readers have been surprised to learn about the ability to gather personal data on the friends of people who install a Facebook app, the conversion of a personality quiz into a source of political data, the idea that you can target marketing messages based on individual psychographic profiles, and the surreptitious collection of data under the guise of academic research, later used for political purposes. But there is one group of people who are mostly unsurprised by these revelations: the market researchers and digital marketers who have known about (and in many cases, used) these tactics for years.

… The tactic of collecting friend data, which has been featured prominently in the Cambridge Analytica coverage, was a well-known way of turning a handful of app users into a goldmine.

…Pages and apps like this might have seemed innocent to the average Facebook user, but people in the marketing community were hardly deceived.

“It was pretty common knowledge among people who understood the internet that if you were taking a quiz to find out what kind of cheese you are, somebody on the other end is very interested in getting that data,” says Susanne Yada, a Facebook ad strategist.

…“We did this project for the Hard Rock Cafe Casino in Las Vegas,” Hodder told me. “They wanted to put wands in the ceiling to collect the IMEI [identification] numbers of every phone that went by, map everywhere they went in the casino or on the property, and map them in the hallways up to their rooms. And then they could do a reverse lookup on IMEI numbers because there are companies that aggregate IMEI numbers, and as soon as they figured out who the person was, they could send them offers, text them offers, and the people had not opted in. So they were basically just intercepting your phone, and figuring out how to send messages to you in one form or another.”

…The outrage now directed at Cambridge Analytica and Facebook suggests there might be an appetite for an online ecosystem based on a different compact between consumers, platforms and advertisers. But we won’t build that ecosystem by pretending that this is a matter of a few bad actors. It’s time for us to face up to what online marketers and researchers have known for more than a decade: the contemporary Internet runs on the exploitation of user data, and that fact won’t change until consumers, regulators and businesses commit to a radically different model.

The shady data-gathering tactics used by Cambridge Analytica were an open secret to online marketers. I know, because I was one – The Verge

It surprises me that is not more discussion of the once ubiquitous fb game apps that were formulated to make sending “invitations” and “gifts” something that unlocked more access to the game.

…Or the facebook integration with news media, etc. sites.

In some communities, gun violence is a rare and alarming occurrence. In others, it’s just a fact of life.

…In one study of urban youth, 42 percent reported having seen someone shot or knifed and 22 percent reported having seen someone killed. Indirect exposure through the sound of gunfire is only now being explored.

…What kind of damage does this do to young people? Exposure to gun violence has been linked to a variety of psychological challenges like anger and dissociation, anxiety and depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It can also affect youth in the classroom, making it difficult for them to concentrate in class and damaging their academic performance and educational or career aspirations. [emphasis: mine]

… Crime encourages urban flight, which can impose a wide range of social costs on families who leave the city, from longer commutes to distance from family and friends. For those who stay, violent crime can impose tangible costs by reducing housing values and community investment, making it difficult to build wealth.

Raising the Voices of Gun Violence

hmmmm

Government data and academic research on children and gun violence show that the young people of the United States are at disturbing risk of getting shot — by other children, by their parents, by themselves, by strangers.

…Nineteen kids a day killed or hurt by guns that were too easy to access; 135,000 students studying in schools where shots have rung out; hundreds of millions of dollars spent on medical treatment to save young lives.

…On average, 1,300 children die and nearly 5,800 are treated for gunshot wounds each year, according to a July 2017 study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As The Trace’s Elizabeth Van Brocklin put it, that’s “at least two Little League lineups worth of children” shot every 24 hours.

…Among wealthy, industrialized countries, 91 percent of children under 15 killed by guns die in the United States. The same report found that young Americans (ages 15 to 24) are 49 times more likely to die by gun than their peers in other high-income countries.

…For African-American boys between the ages of 10 and 14, homicide is the second-leading cause of death, at 11 percent. That proportion more than quadruples as this cohort ages: 49 percent of deaths of African-American males between 15 and 19 are homicides — more than the next nine leading causes of death combined. Their white counterparts die from homicides in less than 8 percent of deaths.

Nearly 70 percent of all homicides in 2014 were “firearm homicides,” which means that roughly 34 percent of African-American males who die between the ages of 15 and 19 are killed by a gun.

14 stunning facts that show how gun violence hurts American kids – Business Insider

hmmm