Farmington objects to ACLU-NH joining lawsuit

Alexander Morin filed the suit last year, arguing the town infringed on his free speech by firing him for comments he made on a Farmington community Facebook page. The town argues Morin’s comments violated its social media policy.

The ACLU sought to join the lawsuit in support of Morin arguing the town’s social media policy “is hopelessly overbroad under the First Amendment and effectively bans speech simply because the town disfavors it.”

Morin has agreed to the ACLU-NH joining the lawsuit.

Farmington objects to ACLU-NH joining lawsuit

hmmm

Investigators probing Trump digital campaign operation run by Kushner 

Congressional and Justice Department investigators are now probing whether the digital campaign operation run by Trump son-in-law and top adviser Jared Kushner helped Russia target U.S. voters with fake news stories about Hillary Clinton, according to a new report.

…material from the Russian government that “would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to [his] father,” Trump Jr. replied, “‘If it’s what you say, I love it especially later in the summer.”

Schiff observed, “He’s already talking about timing. So if there was any kind of coordination on the timing of the pushing of either negative stories or false stories by Russian social media trolls then that’s something that we need to know.”

…Russia’s apparent ability “to target states and levels of voters that the Democrats weren’t even aware (of) really raises some questions. How did they know to go to that level of detail in those kinds of jurisdictions?”

…Warner found it noteworthy that the Russians were able to target women and African Americans in Wisconsin and Michigan, while Democrats were “too brain-dead to realize those states were even in play.” Clinton ended up losing Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. 

Report: Investigators probing Trump digital campaign operation run by Kushner – CBS News

hmmmm

Donald Trump Jr. may have crossed the legal line on collusion 

“You cannot benefit from a foreign adversary in this kind of scenario.”Other legal minds agree. “It’s a shocking admission of a criminal conspiracy,” said Jens David Ohlin, associate dean of Cornell Law School, in a statement shared with The Post. “The conversation will now turn to whether President Trump was personally involved or not. But the question of the campaign’s involvement appears settled now. The answer is yes.”

…The fact that Trump Jr. took this meeting while being told what the Russians were up to is as clear as intent can get, legal experts say.

“If he received an email in advance saying, ‘This is coming from the Russian government,’ he’s certainly knowledgeable about where the information is coming from,” Jacobovitz said. “And he attempts to attend a meeting with the hope and intent to obtain inside dirt on Hillary Clinton. That would go a long way in trying to determine whether it’s conspiracy. … It’s not as if he walks into the meeting and he’s surprised by what he’s hearing.”

…Jacobovitz said conspiracy to commit election fraud is the big legal fish Mueller and his team may be trying to fry. But they’re probably also looking at a whole host of laws that could have been broken under this scenario: quid pro quo with the Russians, bribery, potential perjury related to what members of the Trump campaign said under oath to Congress and failing to disclose these contacts in official security forms.

“This goes further than collusion,” he said. Especially now that Trump Jr. appeared to provide proof to all of this.

Donald Trump Jr. may have crossed the legal line on collusion – The Washington Post

hmmm

The Intercept failed to shield its confidential source. Now it’s making amends. 

In Trump era’s first leak arrest, the news site will help fund Reality Winner’s defense.

…, the site — founded by the crusading journalists Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill and Laura Poitras — came under fire for inadvertently failing in that core mission. Now, having taken a deep look at what happened, the Intercept has adopted some reforms, and its parent company is helping a young whistleblower who has been charged under the Espionage Act.

The Trump administration charged 25-year-old Reality Leigh Winner, a former Air Force linguist, with leaking classified information — just hours after the Intercept published a story based on a National Security Agency document describing efforts by Russian military intelligence to hack into America’s voting system.

The Intercept failed to shield its confidential source. Now it’s making amends. – The Washington Post

hmmmmm

The Least the GOP Can Do Now Is Demand the Firing of Kushner

Trump Jr. didn’t attend the Veselnitskaya meeting alone. He brought along his brother-in-law and then–Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.
And when Trump Jr. forfeited his ability to claim ignorance of that meeting’s true nature Tuesday, he forfeited Kushner’s as well: The emails he posted show that he forwarded his entire email chain with Goldstone to the now-senior White House adviser.

One of the president’s most powerful advisers — a man who has played such an active role in shaping the administration’s foreign policy, he’s been called the “second secretary of State” — knowingly met with an agent of the Kremlin in hopes of securing opposition research on Hillary Clinton.

Shortly after Trump’s election, Kushner spoke with the Russian ambassador about setting up a secret communications channel with Moscow — one safe from the prying eyes of American intelligence agencies. Days later, Kushner met with the head of the Russian state-owned bank Vnesheconombank — an encounter that he described as diplomatic, but that the Russian banker insisted was strictly business.

Later, when asked to list any meetings he’d taken with foreign government officials on his application for a top-secret security clearance, all of these incidents slipped Kushner’s mind.

The Least the GOP Can Do Now Is Demand the Firing of Kushner

hmmmm

Trump spars with Chelsea Clinton over Ivanka’s G20 seat 

Donald Trump tweets:

Donald Trump tweets:

Chelsea Clinton, who was 12-years-old when her father Bill Clinton was sworn in as US president, responded:

“Good morning Mr President.”It would never have occurred to my mother or my father to ask me. Were you giving our country away? Hoping not.”

Trump spars with Chelsea Clinton over Ivanka’s G20 seat – BBC News

“Angela M” had better things to do with her time than read the tweets of a toddler but, no, she would pass off her seat to an incompetent hack who is not only wholly unfamiliar with the job at hand.

AG Jeffy Sessy goes to the Senate 

Multiple Democratic senators pressed Sessions on his efforts to seemingly invoke a new version of executive privilege, a protection that shields some executive-branch communications from Congress and the judiciary. He repeatedly suggested he needed to acquire permission from President Trump before replying to some of their queries.

…Sessions played a central role in Comey’s dismissal, including writing Trump a letter formally recommending his removal. Some Democratic lawmakers have claimed that Sessions’s involvement could be seen as a violation of his pledge to recuse himself from matters involving the Russia probe, given that Comey was overseeing it at the time. Sessions, however, asserted the firing fell outside that pledge, despite Trump’s subsequent statement connecting Comey’s ouster directly to the investigation.

“The scope of my recusal, however, does not and cannot interfere with my ability to oversee the Department of Justice, including the FBI.”

…Sessions’s abstention came one day after The Washington Post reported Sessions had failed to disclose two meetings during the presidential campaign with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States, during his Senate confirmation process. In an exchange with Minnesota Democrat Al Franken at his confirmation hearing in January, he’d said he “did not have communications with the Russians.”

…Another eyebrow-raising moment at Comey’s hearing last week was when he discussed Session’s recusal—the part Wyden focused his questioning on Tuesday—and how he didn’t tell Sessions what Trump requested about Flynn. “Our judgment, as I recall, is that he was very close to and inevitably going to recuse himself for a variety of reasons,” Comey told senators, referring to his leadership team at the FBI. “We also were aware of facts that I can’t discuss in an opening setting that would make his continued engagement in a Russia-related investigation problematic.”

Comey’s statement implied that there are reasons for Sessions’s recusal that might not be publicly known, but the attorney general forcefully rebuffed suggestion there’s anything to know. In doing so—just as in his refusals to answer questions—Sessions only seemed to prolong the game of he said-he said that’s characterized the national drama over Russia and the Trump campaign.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Returns to the Senate – The Atlantic

hmmm

Jeff Sessions Gives a Master Class in Dissembling 

Sessions said at the outset that he would “respond to questions as fully as the Lord enables me to do,” by which he apparently meant not very fully.

As soon as he got questions that made him uncomfortable, Sessions stopped citing the Almighty and instead relied on supposedly long-standing Department of Justice rules against talking about private communications in public.

He was happy to say, for example, that he and Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, discussed firing Comey before they were confirmed.

…But he was not willing to talk about anything the president said to him or Rosenstein beyond that, because it would violate those rules about not talking about confidential discussions between high-ranking officials. That gave the hearing a rather surreal air at times.

…Trump said, in a television interview, that he planned to fire Comey regardless of what Sessions and Rosenstein thought and that he did it because of the Russia investigation.

…But at the hearing all [Sessions] would say, more than once, was that he would let Trump’s “words speak for themselves.”

…Well, Feinstein asked, did the Russia investigation come up in the discussion about Comey? “I’m not able to comment on that” because it was a private conversation, Sessions said.

…[Sessions] recused himself from the Russia investigation because Justice Department rules require that any official who was a senior adviser to a candidate in an election stay out of investigations related to that election. But when Senator Ron Wyden asked why he then signed a letter recommending that Comey be fired over the Clinton campaign email investigation, Sessions grew angry.

“It did not violate my recusal,” he shouted.

—–

I guess surreal is one to put it.

Jeh Johnson says FBI delayed notification of DNC cyberattack

Johnson did admit that there was a delay between the time it took for the FBI to learn about the cyberattack at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the time it took for him to learn about the discovery as DHS secretary.

…Johnson said that he’s “not sure” he had authority at DHS to investigate whether votes were altered. He said DHS does not engage in vote recounts and there are others who have that responsibility.

…Johnson explained that one of the candidates, President Trump, was claiming that the election would be “rigged” and that by accusing Russia of being responsible for the cyber intrusions would undermine the integrity of the process. That comment, therefore, prevented the administration from going public about Russia sooner, he suggested.

…He said his recollection is that the FBI first discovered the intrusion into the DNC and he said “I recall very clearly that there was a delay between that initial contact” with the DNC and when the report got to him as DHS secretary.

Watch Live: Jeh Johnson testimony on Russian meddling – CBS News

hmmmm

House Dems Pressure WH on Kushner, Flynn Security Clearances 

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/06/21/us/politics/ap-us-trump-kushner-security-clearance.html

 

In a letter Wednesday, 18 members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said they have “serious concerns” about how the White House is handling classified information and who is being allowed access to such sensitive material. The letter, citing press reports, singles out Kushner for failing to disclose numerous contacts with foreign officials on his security clearance questionnaire. It also questions why the White House allowed Flynn to have access to classified information after learning that he had misled administration officials about the content of conversations with a Russian diplomat.

——-
hmmmmm

Ex-Homeland Security official says politics molded Russia response 

Given the scope and breadth of the Kremlin’s attempts to interfere in the November election, the Obama administration has faced questions about the timing of its public disclosure, just a month before Americans went to the polls. According to Johnson, he was “very concerned” about signs of Russian meddling as early as the late summer.

“Why wasn’t it more important to tell the American people the length and breadth of what the Russians were doing to interfere in an election than any risk that it might be seen as putting your hand on the scale?” ranking member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) asked. “Didn’t the public have a compelling need to know?”

…In a separate hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday morning, a current DHS official told lawmakers that Russia targeted election-related systems in 21 states leading up to the election.

…[Johnson]echoed previous testimony from Clapper, saying that he did not know the factual basis for the FBI to open the probe.

But, he said, Comey would not have opened a counterintelligence investigation on a mere hunch. Pressed by Schiff on whether the director would require an evidentiary basis to open such an investigation, Johnson affirmed: “Based on everything I know about Jim Comey and the FBI, yes.”

Ex-Homeland Security official says politics molded Russia response | TheHill

hmmm

 

Sylville Smith case verdict: Dominique Heaggan-Brown not guilty

The case posed the question of whether the officer was acting in self-defense or shooting a man who was no longer armed

Sylville Smith case verdict: Dominique Heaggan-Brown not guilty – CBS News

Nah, the case posed the question of whether or not the police have the right to murder at will and without consequences. Apparently they do. Once can only hope the family sues the city, the police force, and Heaggan-Brown past bankruptcy all the way to Kingdom Come.

In Ziglar v. Abbasi, Clarence Thomas signals his support for civil rights plaintiffs.

The case of Ziglar v. Abbasi began the week following the Sept. 11 attacks, when the FBI received more than 96,000 terrorism-related tips from the public—some based in fact, many based on nothing more than fear of Arabs and Muslims. A group of high-ranking Department of Justice officials, including Attorney General John Ashcroft, then–FBI Director (now Special Counsel) Robert Mueller, and Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner James Ziglar, developed and implemented a policy by which undocumented Arab and Muslim men encountered while investigating these tips would be arrested and held in custody under highly restrictive conditions until they could be cleared of suspicion; once they were cleared, they were then deported. Many of the men were detained in a high-security unit at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where they were held for months and subject to brutal conditions, even after federal law enforcement officials knew of their innocence. The DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General conducted an extensive and detailed investigation into the conditions at the detention center, finding they included “inadequate access to counsel,” “sporadic and mistaken information to detainees’ families and attorneys about where they were being detained,” “lockdown for at least 23 hours a day,” and “detainees placed in heavy restraints whenever they were moved outside their cells,” in addition to a catalog of physical and verbal abuses.

…The modern doctrine of qualified immunity prevents government officials from being subject to personal liability for damages unless the official can be shown to have violated “clearly established law”—that is, some closely analogous precedent that would’ve put an officer on notice that his conduct was illegal. The qualified immunity defense is available to officials in all federal civil rights cases, and courts have required plaintiffs to show “clearly established law” with increasing (and sometimes absurd) degrees of specificity in recent years. Qualified immunity has become an impossibly difficult hurdle for plaintiffs to clear and has drawn widespread criticism, including from Kennedy and Thomas. But this week’s concurrence from Thomas is the most direct call for change to date.

…Thomas cites a forthcoming paper by University of Chicago law professor Will Baude, which argues that qualified immunity has expanded well beyond its historical scope to protect modern officers from liability for claims to which no immunity would have been applicable in the past.

In Ziglar v. Abbasi, Clarence Thomas signals his support for civil rights plaintiffs.

hmmm

Trevor Noah: ‘I Have Been Stopped by Police 8 to 10 Times’ in 6 Years in US (Video) – SFGate

Like, a Tesla, people, host says. “The Daily Show” is usually about the jokes, but in a behind-the-scenes clip, host Trevor Noah got serious to talk about his experiences as a black man living in the U.S. 

Trevor Noah: ‘I Have Been Stopped by Police 8 to 10 Times’ in 6 Years in US (Video) – SFGate

hmm

‘Get back! Get back!’: Seattle police release recordings of fatal shooting of Charleena Lyles 

Seattle Police released dashcam video and audio of the fatal shooting of Charleena Lyles in Magnuson Park. Officers can be heard shouting “Get back! Get back!” before gunfire breaks out. Also, details from a June 5 call to her home bear striking similarity to Sunday’s incident.

‘Get back! Get back!’: Seattle police release recordings of fatal shooting of Charleena Lyles | The Seattle Times

hmmmm

Trump makes bizarre claims at press event as Cabinet members take turns praising him

On Monday, the president ran a press conference that appeared designed to bathe him in praise in front of TV cameras.

Trump makes bizarre claims at press event as Cabinet members take turns praising him

The craven, delusional bs the Cheeto keeps shitting out is a gross embarrassment to what it means to be a leader and what it means to be an American. What a pathetic loser!