Apps and websites that use telemedicine and other methods to offer prescriptions have sprung up with little of the furor expected in issues involving reproductive health.

Birth Control via App Finds Footing Under Political Radar

Awesome.

Witchy, too girly, mumsy or a bit like Jimmy Krankie – you’d never hear the same level of criticism for leftwing male politicians

How should Hillary Clinton dress? However she goddamn pleases | Fashion | The Guardian

Yup.

Overt sexism is significantly more likely to be tolerated in our society than overt racism. It is a low-risk form of bigotry and discrimination that rarely damages professional or political careers. Because of this, far fewer people worry about crossing that line.

…the one thing that seems to most negatively and consistently affect public perception of Hillary is any attempt by her to seek power. Once she actually has that power her polls go up again. But whenever she asks for it her numbers drop like a manhole cover.

…a media frenzy has been aimed at Hillary Clinton for accepting speaking fees of $225,000 while Donald Trump has been paid $1.5 MILLION on numerous occasions with hardly a word said about it.

…Hillary is nobody’s idea of perfect. Fine. But in my view if a man with her qualifications were running in the Democratic primary, Bernie would have been done before he even started. And if a man with her qualifications had been running for the Republicans, they’d be anointing him the next Reagan while trying to sneak his face onto Mount Rushmore.

Thinking About Hillary — A Plea for Reason — Medium

hmmm

A federal judge weighing whether to block a new Indiana law banning abortions sought because of a fetus’ genetic abnormalities sounded skeptical of the measure during a Tuesday hearing, saying it may infringe on some women’s right to an abortion.

Judge: Indiana abortion law may infringe on women’s rights – Chicago Tribune

mmmhmmm

“who has sacrificed her feminine power by excelling in the imperialist white supremacist capitalistic patriarchal narrative.”

Open Letter to Hillary Rodham Clinton: Skeletons From Our Past

What an ignorant, hateful, little cunt this author is.  …And crazy. Total fucking nutjob whackjob.

Her thesis is that Clinton is somehow culpable in a violent sexual assault (that she has absolutely zero connection to) because the author does not approve of attorney’s defending criminals who are guilty? Never mind that one of the few saving graces of our (in)justice  system is that all defendants have to right to a defense, the right to an attorney making their case for them in the court of law… OR that all defense attorney’s might be in that position at one point or another. This random fact provides the basis to indite Clinton for… Well, it’s really hard to tell for what exactly.

Or does the author simply hate on the woman because she does not approve of Clinton making headway and having some success swimming upstream against the social currents of patriarchy? The thinking seems to run that to succeed in less than ideal circumstances is somehow an offense to those who did not. It comes off as nasty, shrill, jealousy and nothing more.

Earth to ignorant little troll, there is nothing more anti-woman than hating on a woman for no other reason that she experienced success in a male-centric environment.

Calling someone racist (and let’s be honest here, that is all that is implied when someone uses the term “mighty white” in this context) because they don’t see things exactly as you do is not only ignorant and insulting to anyone involved in actual struggle for actual, real-life justice in the face of actual, non-fictional racism but reeks of jealousy and bigotry on the part of the person mis-using the term.

…And blaming a woman, any woman, for the sins of people she does not know and has no contact has no merit in fact or ideal.

In fact, blaming a woman for a crime committed by a man against other women does nothing other than pull all women down.

The only person culpable in the act of shitting on other women here is the author. That fact is glaringly obvious. There is no justification, and indeed no honor, in assigning blame to those who are wholly unconnected to the offense. It is a tactic employed by those who seek to divide and conquer, those who work against raising people up and empowering them.

If the author thinks she is anything other than a tool of the patriarchy, engaging in tearing all women down and help to keep them down-trodden and oppressed, well she need to listen to that alarm bell. Right now she is the polar opposite of woke as fuck.