…Romney and Bush and the other men who framed their criticism of Trump this way certainly mean well. But their comments imply that women are only worthy of basic respect in relation to men. Without wives, daughters, sisters and granddaughters, would men be unable to muster some base-level compassion for female human beings? …Most men are better than that.
…By refusing to simply condemn Trump’s horror, and instead framing it as an insult only to women or to “our daughters and wives,” these men are treating women as objects. Kind of like how Trump treats women as objects ― calling them pigs, rating their looks, etc.
There seems to be this idea out there that men can only understand sexism, rape or harassment if they think about the victim as a daughter or wife. Why would that be? It’s about thinking of women as possessions. Imagine if Trump was bragging about stealing a [guitar.] And you had to tell someone, “Imagine if I stole your guitar you really love,” in order for them to understand that stealing was wrong.
…When you only conceive of women’s humanity in relation to the men in their lives, that becomes the only way to explain the horror of sexual assault.
…In these men’s estimations, women are only people when they are connected in some way to other men.
Please understand that’s absurd. Women are people all of the time.
…To summarize: Women are humans. Humans don’t deserve to be assaulted. The end.
You Don’t Need A Daughter To Know Trump Bragging About Sexual Assault Is Vile | Huffington Post
Amen.