The Mother of All Bombs: How badly did it hurt IS in Afghanistan? 

Reports of the bomb had made me think that it had wiped out the IS stronghold here in Achin district. I assumed that US and Afghan troops would have sealed off the area and that IS (or Daesh, as it is known here) would be in disarray.

An Afghan officer corrected me. “For a start this bomb wasn’t as powerful as you think,” he said.

“There are still green trees standing 100m away from the site of the impact.”

…”Daesh hasn’t gone anywhere; there are hundreds of caves like the one the Americans bombed,” the officer says, adding that strikes have continued since the bomb was dropped. “They can’t get rid of them like this.”

…Unlike the Taliban, who tend to have many supporters in their core areas, IS seem to have angered a lot of people. Few seemed unhappy about the US bombardment.

…However, there was anxiety. One man, Khaled, said local people were pawns in a US game.

“[Dropping the bomb] was a trick to show the world that their mission was going well. But this wasn’t the type of bomb they showed in the media. The bomb did nothing.”

“Will IS come back?” I asked.

“Yes, as soon as the government leaves, the locals won’t be able to fight them. If the government makes permanent bases in the area and helps us, then we will be happy,” he answered.

The Mother of All Bombs: How badly did it hurt IS in Afghanistan? – BBC News

hmmmm

Pakistan PM says he is shocked by blasphemy killing 

Condemnation follows the brutal death of a student at the hands of a campus mob.

…Critics say blasphemy laws, which allow the death penalty in some cases, are often misused to oppress minorities.

…Mr Sharif, who has supported a wide-ranging crackdown on blasphemous content on social media, condemned the attack, in his first statement on Thursday’s killing.

Pakistan PM says he is shocked by blasphemy killing – BBC News

hmmm

Nikki Haley says ‘regime change’ in Syria. Rex Tillerson doesn’t. What gives? 

Haley seemed to be quite clearly announcing that regime change was a priority in Syria. Tillerson pointedly said it was not and that nothing at all had changed in terms of America’s policy and priorities in Syria.

Why the confusion? My guess is that it’s not confusion at all. It’s two factions within the foreign policy wing of the Trump White House trying to convince the president of the rightness of their positions on Syria via public channels.

Nikki Haley says ‘regime change’ in Syria. Rex Tillerson doesn’t. What gives? – CNNPolitics.com

hmmm

Syria chemical ‘attack’: Damascus attaches conditions to UN inquiry 

At least 27 children were killed in the alleged chemical attack on Tuesday.

…The Syrian foreign minister has set out conditions for any UN investigation into the deaths of dozens of people from a chemical agent on Tuesday.

Walid Muallem told the BBC it would have to be non-political, involve “many countries” and “start from Damascus” before his government could accept.

He denied Syria had dropped chemical weapons from the air, despite facing widespread scepticism.

Syria chemical ‘attack’: Damascus attaches conditions to UN inquiry – BBC News

Oi….

ISIL kills dozens execution-style in Syria 

[ISIL] killed 33 people execution-style in eastern Syria on Wednesday, according to a monitoring group.

…The report said the people were between ages 18 and 25 and were “killed by sharp tools.” It added that it is unknown whether the victims were Syrian government forces, allied militia or rebel factions.

The report came as [ISIL] killed at least 22 people in the Iraqi city of Tikrit, also on Wednesday.

[ISIL] gunmen indiscriminately opened fire on police and civilians in the central Iraqi city before they blew themselves up, police officials told CNN. At least 31 other people were wounded in the attack.

ISIS kills dozens execution-style in Syria – CNN.com

hmmmm