Why a woman shouldn’t have been allowed to adopt

The title of this article is, “Why One Mother Gave Back Her Adopted Son,” and the answer is because she is a horrible parent.

When her oldest start acting out, she decided she loved him less. At 5 years old she held him to the standards she would hold her husband to, a full grown adult. She couldn’t handle the task of being a parent and she took the coward’s way out.

If her biological child – you know the one she actually loved – had done this, how would she have handled it? Would she have relinquished custody to the state or would she have fought to get him the help that he so clearly needed because that is what a parent does? After reading this article, it is pretty clear she never would have given up on her biological child.

If you take a child into your home – and supposedly your heart – and then take your love away when they are not perfect, you do not deserve to be a parent. The child – who you are too much of a child yourself to love as a parent should love their child – deserves better.

All parents who abandon their children – whether biological or not – deserve to face the consequences of their vile, selfish, irresponsibility. If you abandon your child, whether their connection to you is biological or not, you deserve to face jail time for your crime of child abuse.

There is no excuse for not following through when you take on the responsibility of being a parent. None. Apologist bullshit like this article only serves to provide shelter for derelict parents and child abusers. Shelter from the prosecution, social stigma and shame that these horrible people so richly deserve.

The fact that the state then authorized these selfish, irresponsible assholes to foster other children is an equally appalling crime.